Comparing JavaScript Error Monitoring Tools
Datadog vs Raygun
The best way to compare Datadog vs Raygun: features, plans, pricing, error reporting, ignore rules, bug tracking, support and more.
Frontend-First vs Enterprise Approach
Datadog is incumbent Enterprise Observability tool with broad capabilities and a high price tag, while Raygun is a growing player in that space with a lot of specialization for .NET. Datadog will be more useful for DevOps teams at large companies, while Raygun is useful for .NET organizations that have a smaller operational budget. For a lower-cost alternative focused on small teams for frontend error tracking, consider TrackJS.
Datadog
Monitoring, Security, and Digital Experience platform for big enterprises with big budgets.
-
Multi-platform logging (web, mobile, cloud)
-
Performance profiling and monitoring
-
Limited server-side ignore rules
-
Outsourced support team
-
Publicly traded rent seeking
Raygun
Application Crash Reporting for .NET focused organizations.
-
Multi-platform logging (web, mobile, cloud)
-
Performance profiling and monitoring
-
Limited server-side ignore rules
-
Aggressive data sampling
-
Unsustainable business funding
Pricing Comparison
Compare the subscription plans and pricing of your error monitoring tools.
Datadog Pricing
-
14 Day Free Trial
-
Annual Discount
-
Pro @ 100,000 Events
$54Errors: 100,000Retention: 15 DaysCustom Events: 500 -
Pro @ 500,000 Events
$198Errors: 500,000Retention: 15 DaysCustom Events: 500 -
Enterprise @ 1,000,000 Events
$387Errors: 1,000,000Retention: 15 DaysCustom Events: 1000
Feature Comparison
Compare the core features of a front-end error monitoring tool.
Datadog Features
-
Reporting Capability
-
Frontend Error Tracking
-
Backend Error Tracking
-
Sourcemapped Stack Traces
-
Custom Metadata
-
Data Quality
-
Configured Sampling
-
Custom Error Grouping
-
Reporting Capability
-
Pre-built Dashboards
-
Queryable Reports
-
Release Tracking
-
Custom SQL-like Queries
-
Alerting
-
Email and Chat Notifications
-
Issue Notifications
-
Email Summary Reports
Raygun Features
-
Reporting Capability
-
Frontend Error Tracking
-
Backend Error Tracking
-
Sourcemapped Stack Traces
-
Custom Context
-
Data Quality
-
Automatic sampling during spikes
-
Custom Error Grouping
-
Reporting Capability
-
Pre-built Dashboards
-
Release Tracking
-
Custom SQL-like Queries
-
Alerting
-
Email and Chat Notifications
-
Issue Notifications
-
Email Summary Reports
Support and Sustainability
How does each tool support your team and ensure sustainability of the services.
Datadog Support
-
Outsourced Supported
-
LocationSan Francisco, CA, USA
-
Funding ModelPublic
Raygun Support
-
Tiered Support
-
LocationNew Zealand
-
Funding ModelVenture Capital
Compare Alternatives
Find alternative tools that fit your needs and budget better. Check out the detailed comparison and product reviews of the 5 best front-end error monitoring tools.
Datadog is incumbent Enterprise Observability tool with broad capabilities and a high price tag, while Raygun is a growing player in that space with a lot of specialization for .NET. Datadog will be more useful for DevOps teams at large companies, while Raygun is useful for .NET organizations that have a smaller operational budget. For a lower-cost alternative focused on small teams for frontend error tracking, consider TrackJS.
“With TrackJS, the focus is on errors occurring on the browser. Filtering is second to none, and the quick views of trending errors are helpful in digging past the 3rd party script noise. It filters down to the core issues.”
